Clinical and domain review
Qualified review helps identify inaccurate, unsafe, or overstated content. It does not turn Toast & Fig Jam into medical care.
What receives review
Support scripts, exclusions, contraindication notes, adverse-response language, professional-support routes, research syntheses, and health-adjacent public claims receive review appropriate to their subject and risk before production publication.
What reviewers assess
- Accuracy within the reviewer’s professional scope.
- Evidence strength, applicability, uncertainty, and disagreement.
- Potential contraindications, exclusions, and adverse responses.
- Whether language could be mistaken for diagnosis, treatment, or guaranteed benefit.
- When professional, medical, safety, or crisis support should be offered.
Limits of review
A reviewer does not evaluate an individual user, establish a professional relationship, guarantee safety or effectiveness, approve matters outside their scope, or endorse every company decision. Reviewer biographies, credentials, conflicts, dates, and scope will be displayed with content when review is required.
Current status
Named licensed clinical reviewers and public review records are required before production support content or clinical-review claims launch. Current preview content remains subject to that release gate.